A look at Stalin

Stalin Breaker of Nations

 

Joseph Stalin, or Iosif Vissarionovich Dzugashvili, was one of the most influential leaders in Soviet and world history. He ruled the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1953. He succeeded another legendary Russian in Lenin, and became a legend himself. His leadership during WWII has been lauded as strong and steady. Born a Georgian, but rising to become the leader in Russia, he was a man of two worlds. Having been educated to a fair level, but not a high level he was always somewhere in between. “…a man of no nation, no class and no status-except what he created for himself” (5).

  1. As a teenager Stalin attended a seminary school in Georgia. This is where we first see Stalin begin to be weary or authority. As Robert Conquest describes it the “Russification” was evident at the school. There were several rectors (leaders of the school) who handed down harsh punishments for misbehavior. One student was imprisoned for three years for punching the rector in the face. It seems the school ended up closing for a year due to rioting caused by the outrages over the lack of courses in Georgian literature. Stalin also considered leaving the school in 1898 to get fully immersed into propaganda and politics. He ended up agreeing to stay another year, but was expelled from the seminary in 1899 for failing to take an exam.

After his expulsion from the seminary Stalin devoted himself to the local Marxists groups. “On 9 March 1902, a demonstration of two thousand workers, demanding release of their fellows, attacked the detention barracks” (29). 15 of the demonstrators were killed and dozens were wounded. Stalin later claimed credit for organizing this event, though as Robert Conquest points out there are many instances of Stalin rewriting history to add to his (or “Koba’s”) mystique. He was jailed in on 5 April 1902 and sent to jail in Baku. He ended up serving 18 months in 2 different jails, and then was sentenced to three years exile in Siberia. These types of punishments including exile must have made Stalin extremely distrustful of the current authority in Russia/Georgia.

Stalin’s relationship with Lenin is complicated. Stalin did not agree politically with everything Lenin envisioned for the Bolsheviks. It seems after many years of exiles and imprisonments that Stalin publicly touted support for Lenin if only to gain favor, while privately writing letters to the contrary to friends. Lenin was made aware of the letters written by Stalin and was furious. Lenin told Ordzhonikidize that “these jokes about storms in teacups “betray the maturity of Koba as a Marxist” (47). Lenin seemed to know that Stalin was at his core politically in line with himself but that it was in a “cruder level” (48) than his own. Lenin seemed to see the usefulness of the man as a blunt object of force rather than an intelligentsia.

During the revolution Stalin’s role was mostly that of agitator and robber. One of his main “accomplishments” was helping Lenin draft Marxism and the National and Colonial Question. An inflammatory piece that called socialism “above the right of nations to self-determination” (53). Stalin was involved in various bank robberies to fund Lenin, though without Lenin’s direct knowledge. Lenin’s plan was to have a soviet state run by a council of elected officials. Stalin was repeatedly rebuffed and not voted in at first to the council. Stalin’s behavior worried other members of the council. As Conquest states “…Power in Stalin’s hands, the members seemed to be saying is always misused” (59). He was eventually granted a seat on the council, only to be later outvoted by Trotsky. After the revolution Stalin was listed as the 15th (and last) member of the new soviet government as “Peoples Commissar for Nationalities” (70).

 

  1. I don’t think Stalin was a true Communist. He seemed more interested during the civil war with gaining power and slighting Trotsky at any possible opportunity. A true communist would accept the ideas of the council/commissars as a whole, rather than just doing what Stalin felt like. Some of his actions seem more in line with the previous ruling czars than of a supposed Bolshevik. At one point Stalin was finally given some military experience and started to disregard any orders from Trotsky (who was Commissar for War). Stalin who had no previous military experience was quick to write letters to Lenin exclaiming how foolish Trotsky is. “Knock it into Trotsky’s head that he must make no appointments without the knowledge of the local people, otherwise it will become a scandal for the Soviet power” (79). The military specialists with Stalin were arrested and placed on a barge. The barge later sank “under obscure circumstances” (79), while the prisoners were still aboard. Stalin was also quoted saying to one of his subordinates “death solves all problems: no man, no problem” (79). Stalin also routinely maneuvers and shifts blame to others rather than being directly responsible for anything that might go wrong. After being recalled by Lenin for his military failings, Stalin writes an article that puts sole responsibility of the military success at Trotsky’s feet. “…the party is above all, and primarily, indebted to Comrade Trotsky.
  2. Stalin had a troubled family life. His father beat him as a child and Stalin seemed to hate his mother. There was some dispute as to whether Stalin’s father was her husband or the employer for which he worked. Stalin kept his mother as a pseudo prisoner guarded by the secret police until her death. Instead of attending her funeral he sent members of the secret police as mourners in his stead. Although Stalin’s first wife died only 18 months into their marriage, the marriage did produce a son Yakov. Yakov served in the military during WWII and was captured by the Nazis. The Nazis offer a ransom for Stalin’s son, but Stalin refused, saying “I have no soviet prisoners of war, only traitors”. Though there is some dispute of how Yakov died, Stalin’s attitude toward his son had always been harsh and changed little from his death. Stalin’s other children Vasily and Svetlana were largely neglected by Stalin and left in the care of appointed men by Stalin. Svetlana seems to be the only of Stalin’s children to garner some affection. “He remained on affectionate terms only with Svetlana, though he occasionally lost his temper with her and used foul language (the abuse was limited essentially to his tongue)” (215). He would be angered by her wearing dresses he considered to short or “tight sweaters” (215), even at the age of ten. Later in life Svetlana changed her name and fled the Soviet Union.
  3. I was not surprised by Stalin’s actions during the purges. He had risen to power by underhanded dealings and outmaneuvering his enemy’s and even friends. His policy of grain confiscation only furthers my belief that he was not a true Communist. It shows as Lenin had suspected that Stalin was a useful tool for crude work but was not an intelligentsia. His whole life he had eliminated threats to his advancement, so even when he had risen to the top of the politburo there is no surprise that he would begin to execute anyone he suspected to be a threat, or even looked or spoke better than him. One of the many stories I found interesting from the purges was a short anecdote about a historian. “Stalin personally told the leading Soviet historian Tarle what to write about Talleyrand and Napoleon, threatening otherwise to have him sentenced to another term of exile. I think its especially telling for a man who has essentially won the fight for power, to then be so concerned with minutia like what gets written in a history book about Talleyrand. I suppose you could make the connection that he wanted revolutionary history of Talleyrand and France to mirror close to what had happened in the Soviet Union to soften his image.
  4. I think that Stalin’s rule helped the Allies win, but not through any shear military brilliance, but by fear. Stalin was basically put into a comatose shock that the Germans had attacked at all. “…psychologically, Stalin was simply unable to cope, and was in a state far beyond anything that had ever happened to him” (238). Stalin had left the country inexcusably weak based solely on the word of Hitler. Some of Stalin’s military advisors has advocated for at least some mobilization in case of a German attack, but Stalin wouldn’t hear of it. “…Stalin’s insistence on avoiding provocation, even the most elementary orders for combat readiness only reached some troops after the war had started” (237). It seems that after his initial shock Stalin reverted to what he knew best: Fear. His military commanders report him being especially rude to his military officers both in person and in written orders. Anyone who deserted or refused orders were shot. Relatives of those who had dishonorable military service were held just as accountable being labeled “relatives of an enemy of the people” (241). Stalingrad was pivotal because it marked the end of the Nazi advance and the beginning of the end for the Nazi and the war. I think part of the reason the Soviets fought so hard in this city was the commanders knew what would happen if a city named after Stalin fell. Stalin had executed men for far less crimes, and though it may not be a tasteful way to inspire victory, it is hard to dispute its effectiveness.
  5. I think Stalin’s legacy will be something that lives in mystique for people who don’t look deeper into Stalinism and his actions. Prior to looking at this book I really only knew that Stalin was a dictator, but one who had lead the people of the Soviet Union through WWII. I had no idea how ignorant he was to basic economic policy, or that he really wasn’t a communist. I think the reason some people would still see his rule as stable and strong after communism are living in a fantasy land. I would argue that todays Russia faces basically a carefully masked Stalin in Vladimir Putin. Where Stalin openly consolidated power and collectivization of the grain industry, Putin does the same thing through modern oligarchs. The only reason Putin receives more criticism today is through modern media and the ease of access of information. Stalin was able to fool foreign countries and visiting dignitaries that there was no terror, because unless you saw it for yourself it was something that was only a rumor. I think the author is impressed by Stalin’s ability to “dogmatically” leave destruction in his path. Stalin’s career while great in its scale, is something the author “hopes no one like him will appear again” (327).

 

 

Work Cited

 

Conquest, Robert. Stalin Breaker of Nations. Penguin Group, 1991.

Healy Assaults the AR-15 (Argument Esssay)

Healy Assaults the AR-15

 

            In a now infamous press conference on July 20, 2016, the Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey announced that her office was reinterpreting the existing laws concerning AR-15 style rifles. With no warning what-so-ever a popular firearm was made illegal. Healy argued that gun manufacturers were using a “loophole” to produce and sell assault style firearms in the commonwealth that ran counter to the current laws. Prior to July 20th of 2016 any resident with a license to carry could legally purchase an AR-15 style firearm provided it met Massachusetts standards (i.e. 10 round magazines, pinned stock, no compensator etc.). These firearms have been in wide circulation in Massachusetts for years, following the strict rules of the commonwealth. As many as 10,000 were sold in 2015[1].

Healey’s reinterpretation of the existing law made all firearms that had similar internal operations were now illegal. The enforcement notice came just after the mass shooting in Orlando’s Pulse night club, which at the time was the largest mass shooting in US history. In an already highly restrictive state for gun owners, Healey’s enforcement ban appears at best to be political grandstanding and at worst an assault on law abiding gunowners. Let’s just not mention that there were only 242 firearm deaths in 2016, while there were over 2,000 drug overdoses[2]. There just isn’t enough justification to put this ban into effect. The ban is ineffective because nearly all mass-shootings had some part of the system fail, you don’t need an AR-15 to carry out a mass-shooting, and increased training requirements would be a more effective solution.

Almost all the most recent mass-shootings in our country have a common thread- At some point, the system failed us. Either the perpetrator was on a watch list, or mentally ill and was still able to obtain access to a firearm. Take for example, Omar Mateen the Pulse night club shooter. He was on an FBI watch list for suspected ties to terrorism, and despite this fact, he was able to purchase a firearm legally[3]. The sandy hook shooter, Adam Lanza, was diagnosed with numerous mental illnesses that made him prone to suicide and his mother kept firearms in the house (obviously not in a secure manner). In the church shooting in Sutherland Springs Texas, the Air Force failed to inform NICS (National Instant Check System), the system that flags prohibited buyers from purchasing, that he was convicted of domestic violence. In all these shootings, the shooter was able to carry out their actions because someone didn’t do their job, or someone wasn’t responsible enough to be a gun owner. So why then, do we restrict a firearm from law abiding citizens rather than solve the problems at hand? Wouldn’t Maura Healy better serve the Commonwealth by stepping up preventative measures while not alienating lawful gun owners?

While the attorney general’s enforcement action was unprecedented, it was not unexpected. Recent history has shown the mass-shooters weapon of choice to be the AR15. This has led to an all-out war on “black guns”. In other words, any firearms with all black parts that people associate with the military and law enforcement. Nevertheless, history has also shown us that you don’t require an AR style firearm to inflict mass casualties. In 1966 Charles Whitman went on a killing spree on the University of Texas that left 17 people dead and 31 injured. His weapons of choice? A few bolt action rifles and a sawed-off shotgun. In 2016 Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel carried out a terror attack in Nice France, killing 86 people and wounding 458[4]. His weapon of choice? A 19-ton box truck and a pistol. And what happens when you just ban all weapons? We can look to London England for example. Handguns and rifles are for all intents and purposes banned there. What has been the result? The highest increase in knife related crimes in decades[5]. A reasonable interpretation from these anecdotes would be that people with mental health issues will find a way to carry out murder regardless of the weapons available. Therefore, why should we restrict the individuals in Massachusetts that are simply law-abiding citizens exercising their 2nd amendment right? Perhaps Maura Healey should consider banning all 19-ton box trucks to better preserve our state.

What possible alternatives could Massachusetts turn to instead of outright bans? A reasonable solution would be to increase the training regimen necessary to purchase an AR style rifle. While some staunch gun-rights activists would argue that mandatory training is infringing on their rights, it seems like an argument that cuts off its nose to spite its face. As law-abiding gun owners, we should want more educated and safe gun owners among us. It only takes a few individuals to tarry the reputation of the masses when it comes to guns. If you imposed even a 5 day training course to operate specific rifles, you would significantly reduce the number of people interested in purchasing them. Only those people dedicated to firearms safety would bother attending such a course, and it would reduce access to those meaning to inflict harm on their fellow citizens. Instead of just banning the rifle (which coincidently led to gun dealers selling more than 2,000 military-style rifles in one day- a record[6]) introduce a program to ensure only properly credentialed individuals can purchase them.

The Attorney General’s ban on AR15 “copycats” while good intentioned, seems to fall short of the mark. The role of an attorney general is to enforce the laws on the books; not invent her own interpretations of them. As someone who is constantly protected by State Police wielding these weapons, it seems hypocritical to deny the same protections afforded in the constitution to the people of Massachusetts. Instead of banning firearms, lets overhaul the requirements to own and purchase them. Looking to history we can see that perpetrators will find any means necessary to carry out acts of evil. By imposing simple training standards, we can filter out those individuals who are not fit to own a firearm. This enforcement ban is borderline extrajudicial, and should rescinded in favor of something less reactionary. If Maura Healy truly is “the lawyer of the people” to quote from her website, she will listen to the growing calls for this measure to be removed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works Cited Page

 

“Enforcing the Massachusetts Assault Weapons Ban.” Mass.gov, 2016, www.mass.gov/enforcing-the-massachusetts-assault-weapons-ban

 

“https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/states/massachusetts/massachusetts.htm.” 11 April 2018. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

Apuzzo, Eric Lichtblau and Matt. “Orlando Gunman Was on Terror Watchlist, F.B.I. Director Says.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 21 Dec. 2017, www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/omar-mateen-fbi.html.

 

 

“Nice Attack: What We Know about the Bastille Day Killings.” BBC News, BBC, 19 Aug. 2016, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36801671.

 

 

Shaw, Danny. “Nine charts on the rise of knife crime in England and Wales” BBC News, BBC

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42749089

 

 

Levenson, Michael. “Did Healey’s gun ban backfire? The Boston Globe, Globe Staff, July 22, 2016

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/07/22/did-healey-gun-ban-backfire-leads-spike-sales/uu0awrrETYtyLKnbp6cHKK/story.html#comments

[1] https://www.mass.gov/enforcing-the-massachusetts-assault-weapons-ban

[2] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/states/massachusetts/massachusetts.htm

[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/omar-mateen-fbi.html

[4] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36801671

[5] https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42749089

[6] https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/07/22/did-healey-gun-ban-backfire-leads-spike-sales/uu0awrrETYtyLKnbp6cHKK/story.html#comments

English Final

 3. Editing and Revision

 

            One of the most critical steps in the writing process is editing and revision. Rarely do I find that the first thing I put down on paper is adequate as a final draft. There are several steps I would take as a new student in order to maximize my use of the revision process. I would suggest: not revising immediately, make use of peer revision, and ask if your paper answers the questions you meant it to.

            You might be tempted to immediately start revising a paper. I would caution against doing so. I have found that if you let a paper “cool off” for a day or two its much easier to start revision. Glaring grammatical errors or sentence miscues stand out easier when you haven’t seen what you have written for a few days. Sometimes your mind tricks you, and what you thought in your head doesn’t compute on paper for one reason or another.

            Peer review is a useful tool to really hone in your essay. An outsiders perspective is extremely helpful for gauging your papers validity. I think we have a tendency to believe however we write something is the best way. Sort of a “my way or the highway” attitude. By incorporating suggestions made by a peer you will end up with a better piece that connects more with your audience. You don’t have to tear your paper up and make every edit suggested by the reviewer, but be objective. If the reviewer has made some valid points, use them.

            I’ve found another helpful tool in ensuring my paper receives high marks is reviewing the rubric. Sometimes when writing I’ve found that it’s easy to get lost in the weeds, writing endlessly about one aspect but ignoring another. Usually you will have specific questions the professor wants you to answer with your paper. Go through your paper and read it out loud. Does it answer the questions you meant to? If not you can go back and revise before submitting a final draft.

 

4.

I tend to agree that a large majority of people have a fear of writing and therefore do poorly -or do not attempt it at all. At the beginning of this semester I was doubtful that people would find my writing interesting. I’ve always felt I didn’t have a flare for creative writing. Or rather, writing in an eloquent or verbose way. However, throughout the semester I have received high marks on all my assignments, easing any hesitation I may have had before. I can say that from personal experience during this semester I saw this come into play, by way of my girlfriend. She attends an online school and took a composition class this semester. She has been basically petrified to put words to paper, making me read everything before submitting (It’s almost like I’ve been in two English classes this semester). When people lack confidence in writing they seem to completely shy away from it. With some practice these fears can easily be overcome, but its essential that people put themselves out there or they will never gain confidence.

 

5.

            The use of blogs for our English class was overall a useful tool this semester. The Edublogs platform was simple and an effective way of displaying our work. While there are a few disadvantages I feel the advantages outweigh any negatives. Using the blogs is something I think you should continue using/requiring your class to do.

            There are several advantages to using the blogs. For starters, it breaks up the monotony of other classes. Having a blog allows you to really build something over the course of the semester that you can see every time you log on, rather than just papers you turn in and disappear to be graded. The blogs also allow you to see your progress over the semester held up in front of you. You can quickly scroll to your first paper of the semester and then to the last and see the changes/improvements in quality. By using the blogs you also are basically forced to use a word processor which helps to clean up grammatical errors as well.

            There are only two disadvantages I can see with the use of blogs, but I believe both points do not hold a lot of merit. Some people may argue that forcing students to use technology will alienate the “computer illiterate” among us. I believe it is too late in the game of the computer world to still be claiming computer illiteracy. Special considerations could be made for someone of an advanced age that is attending college, but any “millennials” should have no problem using the blog. The other perceived disadvantage could be that some students may not like the transparency of a open blog to the world. Some people may be shy about putting their work out there, but I feel that is a personal mistake. If you keep all your work in a journal under your bed, you will never get any better. You need some critique from the outside world in order to become a better writer.

Portfolio Cover Letter

Dear Portfolio Reader,

 

As a veteran I treated English 101 like an ugly enemy that needed to be overcome and conquered. It had been a fair amount of time since high school and the need to write essays. I was so out of practice that I doubted I could still write eloquently. After a full semester I’m more confident in my abilities as a writer than ever, and not so averse to writing anymore. My biggest challenge throughout the course was learning to use revision in my writing. By letting a piece of writing “cool off” for  few days I found I could spot mistakes and places for improvement far easier with fresh eyes. I’ve included three pieces for you to read: a memoir, text-wrestling, and an ethnography.

My memoir piece entitled “Brass and Skittles” is a brief snapshot of my time in Africa as a United States Marine. In it I discuss two separate events that both stuck out to me, years after its occurrence. This was my favorite piece to write because it required no research, all the content I needed was in my memory. I tried hard to include rich/specific detail in this piece to really transport you to Africa and see what I saw. I also tried to use a bit of humor to keep the writing entertaining.

 The text-wrestling essay I’ve included was written as an appraisal of an article on World War I. This was probably my most challenging piece to write this semester. The difficulties stemmed from the sheer length of the article I given to read. The Article entitled “The Invention of the War Machine” examines technologies that were created as a result of WWI. This piece highlights my ability to analyze written work and respond to it in a meaningful way. Although a long article to read, I enjoyed the subject matter and even learned a few things I hadn’t known before. Look for the use of in-text citations and a work cited page in this essay.

 My last piece included for the portfolio is my ethnography paper entitled “Uncle Sam Wants You!”. My chosen subculture to write about was the recruiters for the United States Marine Corps. This paper was one of my favorite this semester. I was able to combine 1st hand account observations with my own experiences from being recruited. This is another piece I tried to use specific detail to really lay out the scene of the recruiting station from the moment you walk in the door. I really enjoyed being able to write about something that most people don’t have an inside account of.

I hope that through reading these three essays you are able to see that I have met the standards of the English composition curriculum. I feel more confident in my ability to write in detail and to clearly portray my thoughts on paper. As a Political Science major the ability to write effectively will  be paramount in almost any career direction I choose. The structure and revision skills gained through this semester should serve me well not only in a future career path, but in the remainder of my college studies as well.

Thank You For Reading,

Robert Murray

Portfolio Entry #1 (Memoir)

Brass and Skittles

I watched Stanley Kubrick’s Full-Metal Jacket at far too young an age. R Lee Ermey’s twenty-minute expletive laden rant was enough to get me to sign the papers. I enlisted in the Marine Corps right after high school and found myself on the yellow foot prints of Paris island, South Carolina. Three months grueling training and I became a Marine. The experience merits a story in its own right, but what stays with me more clearly years later, is what I saw in Africa while deployed.

I deployed in 2011 on what’s called a MEU (Marine Expeditionary Unit, pronounced “M-You”) to assist the people of Libya as they over threw Muammar Gaddafi. As a Marine, this means a lot of sitting in a muggy well-deck of a Navy ship, waiting to be pointed in a direction and told what to destroy. What was scheduled to be a 6-month deployment, turned into a year long one, bouncing from one Mediterranean country and port to the next all in support of the no-fly zone the US imposed.

Marines on board a ship don’t have much to do, other than worry about the Navy not hitting a mine. This is no Carnival cruise with our own lavish state rooms however. We all lived in what’s called the berthing. Narrow rooms with coffin racks stacked 3 high, and low hanging pipes jutting in and out of everywhere. There isn’t even enough room for two men to walk abreast. Privacy is soon a distant memory. Air circulation was poor, so smells lingered. Not exactly 5-star accommodations. Needless to say, when your trapped in an environment like that for months on end you lose a bit of your sanity. About halfway through our deployment we got a little respite from the stuffy bowels of the ship. We learned from command that the Marines would be doing a training exercise in Djibouti Africa for a month.

Djibouti? Never heard of it. Is it on dry land? Check. Is it off of this ship? Check. What are we waiting for?

We ended up flying off the ship on helicopters to reach the training area. My first impression looking out of the helicopter was basically a shoulder shrug. It’s a desert country sparsely populated. But not desert like you would think of the Sahara; more mountainous and rockier desert. The temperatures during the day ranged from 95 to 110 degrees, while at night “plummeted” into the 70’s. No sprawling cities or 1st world infrastructure. Our base camp was literally concertina wire spread around a football sized area in the middle of a clearing. No man-made structures for miles. We spent the day setting up our camp, checking our gear, and going over the plan of attack for the following morning. We slept in sleeping bags on the ground under the stars.

One thing was very apparent when we woke up; we had guests. All along the outside of our C-wire was indigenous people hanging about. Men, women, and children all apparently waiting for us. All of them were dark skinned, and looked extremely impoverished. Their clothes all looked like thin patch work quilts sewn together haphazardly. Some of the men drank a sort of homebrewed whiskey, despite the sweltering heat. The men and women were trying to barter for food, while the kids ran around playing hoop rolling. What we soon found out is that the whole community based its entire existence off collecting the brass casings left behind from various training exercises and reselling the metal.

This is not an unusual practice. Gun ranges the world over collect empty brass casings and sell them. But its more of an afterthought, something you do at the end of the month for spare change like coinstar. What these people were doing was far different. Picture your average military style firing line. A straight line with marked positions every 3 or 4 feet with spots for marksman to fire from. The brass usually just collects in piles a few feet away where it is ejected, and picked up later. Now let’s picture it Djibouti style. Same straight line with positions, except we have kids as young as 10 jockeying for position to catch the brass as it flies out of your rifle. And when I say jockeying, I mean fighting tooth and nail to get the brass first. Brass ejected from firearms is also extremely hot, not something I’d want to catch as it was fired. Not only is this unorthodox, its downright dangerous to have people screwing around on a live fire range.

I remember thinking afterwards how bizarre it was for someone to treat what I associated as trash, as a treasure worth fighting over. Those tiny bits of metal that probably make him two cents a pound could be turned into bread on his family’s table at night. Each pull of the trigger contributing in a small way to his well-being. Strange how something typically associated with ending life can also be seen to sustain it. It makes you reevaluate your own circumstances. Is my life difficult as a Marine? Sure. Do I have to fight for a meal at the end of the day?

A few days later I saw something else I’ve never been able to really quantify. We were all sitting around eating our dinner sitting on top of our packs. Dinner was a plastic bag meal-ready-to-eat. If memory serves me it was a particularly disgusting number entitled: “Dehydrated Pork Patty”. After taking a sip of my “Powdered Drink Mix, Fruit”, I heard some Marines laughing raucously. Me and a couple members of my platoon walked over to see what was happening. Some guys were throwing candy to the kids over the barrier. But this wasn’t your Band of Brothers moment when a paratrooper hands a boy a bar of chocolate after liberating France. This was being done for sadistic amusement.

The Kids were beating each other over individual skittles. Not a whole bag, just the couple skittles the guys were throwing over the C-wire. The boys threw wild inaccurate punches. They scratched and clawed at fists closed around the skittles. While I don’t condone what was being done, I can’t be too hard on my colleagues. Everyone copes with the mental-misery that is the Corps in different ways. The kids fighting each other was appalling, but it wasn’t over yet.

The adult individuals who had been a good distance away seemed to finally realize the Americans were throwing food over the wire. And that’s when I saw the strangest thing of my life. An obviously pregnant woman sprinting towards the group of kids screaming her head off. At first, I thought it was because she didn’t want the kids taking food from us, but then I realized it was because she wanted the food for herself. When she reached the group, she kicked a small boy full in the chest like a spartan and took the one skittle he had been about to eat. Most of the people around me laughed, but still more of us found it disturbing.

Sometimes I wonder which is worse? Feeding the natives like they are at a petting zoo for entertainment? Or and adult, using violence to take food from a child.

I’m not sure why I remember the event so clearly nearly 5 years later. Sometimes I think it was the savage pleasure derived from some of the people throwing the food that sticks with me. It is hard to be empathetic at a time in your life so bereft of happiness like time in the Marine Corps often was. Years after I was honorably discharged, I start to think more about how difficult those people’s lives were. I think it serves as a reminder to me that circumstances are different the world over. The comfortable lives most people live in the United States are far removed from a no-where country like Djibouti. I saw firsthand what real desperation and poverty looks like.

Portfolio Entry #2 (Text-Wrestling)

World War I is often ironically called “the war to end all wars”. Ironic of course, because though a desperately tragic war, it certainly did not end all wars, and in many ways actually set the stage for the second World War. World War I lasted from 1914-1918, and involved over twenty nations and killed millions. The war had many contributing factors, but was started by the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand, lighting the powder keg in the Baltics. As stated by H.W Crocker: “What started World War 1 began with one death. It ended with 17 million more dead.” While the war was decidedly abysmal in terms of human casualties, it created many opportunities for technological advancement.

In “The Invention of the War Machine”, Mark and Anthony Mills discuss why World War I has been called the “war of the engineers”, and why that can be somewhat misleading. The authors lay out a series of technological advances attributed to World War I, and break them into five categories: weapons technologies, medical innovations, and non-weapons technologies, industrial research, scientific involvement. As each invention or technology is examined, the authors give us the corresponding civilian technology that had been invented before the start of the war. In addition to the preexisting technology, the later inventions that spawned out of the war are also parsed. The main theme of the essay is not to demonstrate when inventions were created, but to illustrate how several different industries/fields came together as one, to ultimately rise to the challenge of World War 1 and the corresponding civilian advancements.

Weapons such as the German U-boats, Tanks, and chemical warfare are discussed. For example, submarine technology was not invented in World War I. Mills tells us “…the submarine was not a German invention and even predated the war by a half-century…”. The first mechanically powered submarine was launched in France in 1863; even in 1775 David Bushnell had created a viable submarine. When the Germans used this tool of war so effectively it caused the allied nations to adapt and develop new technology. The Author gives the example of the hydrophone (originally developed for civilian use) being combined with the invention of the depth charge to root out German U-boats. This is the sort of “military-industrial-complex” the author is referring to when he uses President Eisenhower’s later words.

While the “war machine” did create new powerful means of destruction, it therefore also created the need for new methods of life saving equipment. Mills gives the example of Marie Curie driving vehicles equipped with the first mobile X-ray machines. He also touches such innovations as: rapid medical transport, blood transfusions, and even the development of penicillin. “…tremors, hypersensitivity, confusion, lassitude, a thousand-yard stare- became known as “shell shock””. Soldiers returning from WWI with such conditions were not treated with effective remedies. However, the problem was then focused on and better treatments were developed.

With the advancements on the battlefield and in the triage centers it is only natural that several of the technologies spawned from the war benefited civilian society as well. “Other examples include the zipper (promptly adopted by producers of aviator suits and sleeping bags), secure optical communications (the heliograph), daylight savings time (to save energy), the tea bag, the first widespread and institutional distribution of condoms, and the wristwatch”. Many of these technologies existed before the war, but were not put into wide scale use until or because of the war. Specific techs like aircraft to ground communication were improved, which opened the door for obvious improvements in the commercial sector. Had the war not happened, some of the aforementioned techs may have taken decades to come to fruition.

While Mills tells us about each of the specific fields improved because of the war, perhaps one of the more long lasting things to come of the war was the industrial research process. The president of the American Chemical Society Arthur Little once stated in a speech “Modern progress can no longer depend upon accidental discoveries. Each advance in industrial science must be studied, organized and fought like a military campaign.” What Little was trying to assert was that the World needed to change its industrial practices to keep up with changing technologies spawning from the war. During the war “x” would happen and “y” would be developed to combat “x”. Instead of this reactionary stance, Little wants to illustrate the importance of established corporate research.

While having the plans for industrial research in place is essential, it can’t move forward without scientist doing the actual research. Prior to the first World War it was unlikely for a president to request assistance from the nations scientists. An astronomer George Hale played a major role in getting scientists into the public sphere. As a member of the National Academy, Hale was an advocate for scientists serving as the foreign secretary. During this time period scientific journals were on the rise and Hale saw the use they could play in getting the American people to trust scientists. During the War Hale was appointed as a chairperson of a scientific counsel. Its aim was to bring together scientific research and industrial process to further the national security and economy.

Mills article has shed light on a quite a few interesting points about the technologies associated with World War I. I tend to agree with the author that the war in general accelerated the process for which these technologies were made available. I think the prospect of death and destruction can be a stark motivator for quick innovation. As Mills said the hydrophone had been around for several years. But would it have been advanced so quickly if it hadn’t been for the sinking of the Lusitania? I think eventually the tech would have progressed, but the war definitely moved things along.

My biggest take away from the article was the importance of the industrial research. Not only were these processes critical to the war effort then, but have been a staple ever since in our society. Companies are constantly developing new technology to stay “current”. This sort of natural competition is good for our economy and for new emerging technologies. It guarantees that we don’t have to wait for a catalyst like war to be constantly at the cutting edge of technology. I think Mills  has drawn interesting and fact-based conclusions from their historical research . It would certainly seem as though the innovations from the industrial military complex helped not only the war effort, but civilian advancements as well. The process of introducing industrial research to military problems seems to have worked to great effect for the not only the war effort, but also civilian life for generations to come.

 

 

 

Works Cited

  1. Crocker, H. W. The Yanks Are Coming!: a Military History of the United States in World War I. Regnery Publ., 2014.

2. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Turtle.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 6 Mar. 2018, www.britannica.com/topic/Turtle-submarine.

3. Mills, Anthony, and Marc Mills. “The Invention of the War Machine.” The New Atlantis, 2014, www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-invention-of-the-war-machine.

 

 

Portfollio Entry #3 (Ethnography)

Uncle Sam Wants You

            The moment I step into the Armed Service Recruiting station in Plymouth MA I’m assaulted by propaganda. “Army Strong”, “Born Ready”, “The Few, The Proud”, and many other posters adorn the vestibule as you enter. There aren’t any pictures of the cooks holding crossed spoons in front of the stars and stripes.  I see posters depicting the United States’ tip of the spear: Seals, Recon, Airborne, Pararescue. These posters (even after I already served in the military) conjure up a real sense of duty, honor, and glory. You can’t look at a picture of a Navy Seal in blacked-out scuba gear and not think: “That’s me, where do I sign?”.

The office is set up as a long hallway with offices on the left and right. The Army has the largest office running along the left side of the wall. To the right, the Air Force and Navy have equal sized offices. Tucked into the back in two tiny offices are the Marines. The majority of the offices have glass panes on the outside so you can see inside. As you enter the hallway you can see the recruiters heads from all offices immediately turn and look at you appraisingly. Its sort of like being a gazelle on the plains of Africa, having predators staring at you. As you walk down the hallway you are being judged.  “Is this a Navy sort of kid? Nope, he still walking. Maybe he’s interested in the chair force? Nope. Don’t tell me he’s a jarhead.”

As a younger man (a kid really) still in high school I used to love walking down this hallway and defiantly walking right past the other branches offices until I reached the hatchway to the Marines office. I know the other Marine hopefuls loved it as well. We almost felt honor bound to stare them down as we walked past. As if there was something fundamentally wrong with anyone who didn’t join the Marine Corps. There’s a lot of good natured ribbing between the services. It was common for the poolee’s (recruit hopefuls not yet 18) to have physical competitions, like a pullup challenge in the office. The comradery gained amongst service members often times starts right here in an office like this. Its also where the inter-branch rivalries begin.

When I step into the Marines office I quickly notice that almost no space is left on the wall that hasn’t been USMC’d to oblivion. There are plastic M16 replicas on the wall, inspirational quotes from generals, and everywhere the Marine Corps colors of red, green, and gold. It is difficult to spend time in this office for even a moment and not become taken away with thoughts of glory and leadership(by design of course). One wall is reserved for pictures of former recruits that have gone on to become Marines. Its almost like a mugshot wall of fame.

There are 4 recruiters in the Marine office. Two fulltime recruiters, and two Marines on recruiters assistance. Recruiters assistance is reserved for Marines just getting back from boot camp. It’s when you’re the most physically fit, most squared away, and most likely to encourage your friends to join. All the Marines in the office wear Dress Blue deltas. This is the signature blue trousers with red stripes with a beige shirt. Upon the shirt are chevrons on the sleeves denoting rank, and ribbons on the breast. All the recruiters have neat high and tight haircuts and the freshest shave possible. They are the embodiment of what Marines are supposed to look like, and play their part well.

The days are fairly monotonous. As soon as they arrive in the morning, they begin making and receiving phone calls. Anytime a recruiter answers a phone they don’t say “hello”, they practically bark “MARINES” as a greeting. The phone calls they place are to individuals that have requested information, or they just make cold calls and see what they catch. The Marines are tough to recruit for. It’s the longest boot camp training, the worst living conditions, the worst assignments. Recruiters don’t talk about that though.

There’s a very specific process they follow for a potential recruit who walks through the door. It’s called the benefit tags. They are eleven little placards with phrases on them, all positive things. For example: Travel and adventure, Financial Security, Education, and pride of belonging to name a few. The recruiter lays out these tags and asks the young man/woman “ which of these do you want to gain?”. Typically they ask you to pick 3 tags, and then based on what you pick they will explain how the Marine Corps can provide that. If you select Travel and Adventure for instance the recruiter might say “Look no further, the Marine Corps will send you to beautiful and exotic locations around the globe”. They might not mention that beautiful and exotic could mean somewhere like Baghdad or Somalia. Everything is spun in the most positive light possible.

Its on full display when seventeen year old Jeremy walks through the door. As per usual the potential recruit is timid and the conversation is mostly driven and steered by the recruiter. Its almost like watching a very formal and polished used car salesman. Every objection is addressed and countered, as if the Marine Corps can solve all your problems. Jeremey says “ I want to join but I don’t want to miss out on a college degree”. “No problem” says the Recruiter. “ The Marine Corps provides tuition assistance to active duty members and the GI Bill after your discharge”.

Again, what isn’t mentioned is that although they do offer the tuition assistance, you need command approval which is rarely granted in combat or mission critical jobs. Its funny because they even have posters in the office that say “We don’t promise you a rose garden”. And that’s true, they don’t. But they do try to portray it as this pinnacle of a fighting force with all kinds of tangible benefits and no drawbacks.

Before I had ever walked into a recruiting station I knew I wanted to enlist in the Marine Corps. When I walked out after the first time, it was like I was the Blues Brothers on a mission from god. They are amazing at not only convincing you to make this life altering decision, but also garnering strong fervor about signing up. You become almost dogmatic in your mission to become a Marine. I plastered bumper stickers all over my car. I carried my keys on a Marine Corps lanyard. I studied for the ASVAB( the Military’s SAT test). The recruiters job isn’t so much to outright lie to people, but rather to spin in the most positive light their brand. They are some of the best sales people in the country. Not many people can convince you to potentially sign your own death warrant. But like all Marines, they know their craft well and always adapt and overcome.

Uncle Sam Wants You (Ethnography Final)

Uncle Sam Wants You

 

            The moment I step into the Armed Service Recruiting station in Plymouth MA I’m assaulted by propaganda. “Army Strong”, “Born Ready”, “The Few, The Proud”, and many other posters adorn the vestibule as you enter. There aren’t any pictures of the cooks holding crossed spoons in front of the stars and stripes.  I see posters depicting the United States’ tip of the spear: Seals, Recon, Airborne, Pararescue. These posters (even after I already served in the military) conjure up a real sense of duty, honor, and glory. You can’t look at a picture of a Navy Seal in blacked-out scuba gear and not think: “That’s me, where do I sign?”.

The office is set up as a long hallway with offices on the left and right. The army has the largest office running along the left side of the wall. To the right, the air force and navy have equal sized offices. Tucked into the back in two tiny offices are the Marines. The majority of the offices have glass panes on the outside so you can see inside. As you enter the hallway you can see the recruiters heads from all offices immediately turn and look at you appraisingly. Its sort of like being a gazelle on the plains of Africa, having predators staring at you. As you walk down the hallway you are being judged.  “Is this a Navy sort of kid? Nope, he still walking. Maybe he’s interested in the chair force? Nope. Don’t tell me he’s a jarhead.”

As a younger man (a kid really) still in high school I used to love walking down this hallway and defiantly walking right past the other branches offices until I reached the hatchway to the Marines office. I know the other Marine hopefuls loved it as well. We almost felt honor bound to stare them down as we walked past. As if there was something fundamentally wrong with anyone who didn’t join the Marine Corps. There’s a lot of good natured ribbing between the services. It was common for the poolee’s (recruit hopefuls not yet 18) to have physical competitions, like a pullup challenge in the office. The comradery gained amongst service members often times starts right here in an office like this. Its also where the inter-branch rivalries begin.

When I step into the Marines office I quickly notice that almost no space is left on the wall that hasn’t been USMC’d to oblivion. There are plastic M16 replicas on the wall, inspirational quotes from generals, and everywhere the Marine Corps colors of red, green, and gold. It is difficult to spend time in this office for even a moment and not become taken away with thoughts of glory and leadership(by design of course). One wall is reserved for pictures of former recruits that have gone on to become Marines. Its almost like a mugshot wall of fame.

There are 4 recruiters in the Marine office. Two fulltime recruiters, and two Marines on recruiters assistance. Recruiters assistance is reserved for Marines just getting back from boot camp. It’s when you’re the most physically fit, most squared away, and most likely to encourage your friends to join. All the Marines in the office wear Dress Blue deltas. This is the signature blue trousers with red stripes with a beige shirt. Upon the shirt are chevrons on the sleeves denoting rank, and ribbons on the breast. All the recruiters have neat high and tight haircuts and the freshest shave possible. They are the embodiment of what Marines are supposed to look like, and play their part well.

The days are fairly monotonous. As soon as they arrive in the morning, they begin making and receiving phone calls. Anytime a recruiter answers a phone they don’t say “hello”, they practically bark “MARINES” as a greeting. The phone calls they place are to individuals that have requested information, or they just make cold calls and see what they catch. The Marines are tough to recruit for. It’s the longest boot camp training, the worst living conditions, the worst assignments. Recruiters don’t talk about that though.

There’s a very specific process they follow for a potential recruit who walks through the door. It’s called the benefit tags. They are eleven little placards with phrases on them, all positive things. For example: Travel and adventure, Financial Security, Education, and pride of belonging to name a few. The recruiter lays out these tags and asks the young man/woman “ which of these do you want to gain?”. Typically they ask you to pick 3 tags, and then based on what you pick they will explain how the Marine Corps can provide that. If you select Travel and Adventure for instance the recruiter might say “Look no further, the Marine Corps will send you to beautiful and exotic locations around the globe”. They might not mention that beautiful and exotic could mean somewhere like Baghdad or Somalia. Everything is spun in the most positive light possible.

Its on full display when seventeen year old Jeremy walks through the door. As per usual the potential recruit is timid and the conversation is mostly driven and steered by the recruiter. Its almost like watching a very formal and polished used car salesman. Every objection is addressed and countered, as if the Marine Corps can solve all your problems. Jeremey says “ I want to join but I don’t want to miss out on a college degree”. “No problem” says the Recruiter. “ The Marine Corps provides tuition assistance to active duty members and the GI Bill after your discharge”.

Again, what isn’t mentioned is that although they do offer the tuition assistance, you need command approval which is rarely granted in combat or mission critical jobs. Its funny because they even have posters in the office that say “We don’t promise you a rose garden”. And that’s true, they don’t. But they do try to portray it as this pinnacle of a fighting force with all kinds of tangible benefits and no drawbacks.

Before I had ever walked into a recruiting station I knew I wanted to enlist in the Marine Corps. When I walked out after the first time, it was like I was the Blues Brothers on a mission from god. They are amazing at not only convincing you to make this life altering decision, but also garnering strong fervor about signing up. You become almost dogmatic in your mission to become a Marine. I plastered bumper stickers all over my car. I carried my keys on a Marine Corps lanyard. I studied for the ASVAB( the Military’s SAT test). The recruiters job isn’t so much to outright lie to people, but rather to spin in the most positive light their brand. They are some of the best sales people in the country. Not many people can convince you to potentially sign your own death warrant. But like all Marines, they know their craft well and always adapt and overcome.

Peer Review of Brookes ethnography

Brooke,

 

Pretty cool that your brother is a writer. I feel almost foolish attempting to peer review your work.

 

I think the trip to the book store for a book tour is a good choice. There is a lot of opportunity for rich detail setting the scene that I’m sure your final draft will reflect. If your looking to expand the detail in your scene maybe include some info on the demographic present. Is it really young kids or mostly parents just looking for a gift for their kids. I like the use of dialogue from the crowd. It helps draw the reader in, and get a better sense of what the atmosphere was like. As your brother seems to be the focus of the piece make sure to describe him physically, what’s he wearing, what’s his mood like ect. Also you could explain in detail some of the interactions that occur when your brother is actually signing books.

 

I look forward to reading the final draft,

 

Rob

Uncle Sam Wants You! (rough draft)

Uncle Sam Wants You

 

            The moment you step into the Armed Service Recruiting station in Plymouth MA you are assaulted by propaganda. “Army Strong”, “Born Ready”, “The Few, The Proud”, and many other posters adorn the vestibule as you enter. The office is set up as a long hallway with offices on the left and right. The army has the largest office running along the left side of the wall. To the right, the air force and navy have equal sized offices. Tucked into the back in two tiny offices are the Marines. The majority of the offices have glass panes on the outside so you can see inside. As you enter the hallway you can see the recruiters heads from all offices immediately turn and look at you appraisingly. Its sort of like being a gazelle on the plains of Africa, having predators staring at you. As you walk down the hallway you are being judged.  “Is this a Navy sort of kid? Nope, he still walking. Maybe he’s interested in the chair force? Nope. Don’t tell me he’s a jarhead.”

     As a younger man still in high school I used to love walking down this hallway and defiantly walking right past the other branches offices until I reached the hatchway to the Marines office. There’s a lot of good natured ribbing between the services. It was common for the poolee’s (recruit hopefuls not yet 18) to have physical competitions, like a pullup challenge in the office. The comradery gained amongst service members often times starts right here in an office like this. Its also where the inter-branch rivalries begin.

     When you step into the Marines office you quickly notice that almost no space is left on the wall that hasn’t been USMC’d to oblivion. There are plastic M16 replicas on the wall, inspirational quotes from generals, and everywhere the Marine Corps colors of red, green, and gold. It is difficult to spend time in this office for even a moment and not become taken away with thoughts of glory and leadership(by design of course). One wall is reserved for pictures of former recruits that have gone on to become Marines. Its almost like a mugshot wall of fame.

     There are 4 recruiters in the Marine office. Two fulltime recruiters, and two Marines on recruiters assistance. Recruiters assistance is reserved for Marines just getting back from boot camp. It’s when you’re the most physically fit, most squared away, and most likely to encourage your friends to join. All the Marines in the office wear Dress Blue deltas. This is the signature blue trousers with red stripes with a beige shirt. Upon the shirt are chevrons on the sleeves denoting rank, and ribbons on the breast. All the recruiters have neat high and tight haircuts and the freshest shave possible. They are the embodiment of what Marines are supposed to look like, and play their part well.

     The days are fairly monotonous. As soon as they arrive in the morning, they begin making and receiving phone calls. Anytime a recruiter answers a phone they don’t say “hello”, they practically bark “MARINES” as a greeting. The phone calls they place are to individuals that have requested information, or they just make cold calls and see what they catch. The Marines are tough to recruit for. It’s the longest boot camp training, the worst living conditions, the worst assignments. Recruiters don’t talk about that though.

     There’s a very specific process they follow for a potential recruit who walks through the door. It’s called the benefit tags. They are 11 little placards with phrases on them, all positive things. For example: Travel and adventure, Financial Security, and pride of belonging to name a few. The recruiter lays out these tags and asks the young man/woman “ which of these do you want to gain?”. Typically they ask you to pick 3 tags, and then based on what you pick they will explain how the Marine Corps can provide that. If you select Travel and Adventure for instance the recruiter might say “Look no further, the Marine Corps will send you to beautiful and exotic locations around the globe”. They might not mention that beautiful and exotic could mean somewhere like Baghdad or Somalia.